Freedom House led a delegation of civil society leaders and online
activists from around the world to Bali, Indonesia for the 8th Internet
Governance Forum (IGF), the UN's flagship conference for discussing
global Internet policy. Following the IGF, 17 organizations and
individuals signed on to a joint statement to highlight the concerns
they raised throughout the Forum, and to offer recommendations to
governments, internet companies, and international organizations on how
to better protect internet freedoms. This statement was delivered to the
Forum during the Open Mic session on the final day by Bouziane Zaid.
We, the undersigned representatives of a group of civil society leaders
worldwide who attended and participated in the 2013 Internet Governance
Forum (IGF) on October 22-25 in Bali, Indonesia as part of the Freedom
House delegation, make this statement at the meeting’s conclusion to
highlight a number of opinions we expressed and concerns we raised
throughout the Forum.
The 2013 IGF provided a valuable space for the members of our group to
engage with other stakeholder groups, through the Forum’s sessions and
also through side meetings and consultations with representatives of
governments, businesses, the technical community, multilateral bodies,
and civil society organizations from all over the world. We urge all
stakeholders to continue to engage and participate in future IGFs, to
strengthen the Forum’s multistakeholder process, and to uphold the
principles of openness, transparency, and inclusiveness. Without the
IGF, there is no comparable venue for civil society to directly raise
its perspective and concerns with leaders in the government, the private
sector, and the technical community.
We share the sentiment with the vast majority of IGF participants that
the Internet governance process can and should be improved, but stress
the importance of upholding and strengthening the multistakeholder
approach to ensure that the internet remains open, global, secure and
resilient. In calling for more efforts to promote, protect, and advocate
for human rights online, our group has underscored broad principles and
recommendations, such as:
1. All laws, policies, regulations, terms of service, user agreements,
and other measures to govern the internet must adhere to international
standards of human rights, including but not limited to Article 19 of
the UN Declaration of Human Rights, guaranteeing the right to freedom of
expression; Article 12, guaranteeing the right to privacy; and Article
20, guaranteeing the right to free association. As an important step,
states and other stakeholders must look to Human Rights Council
Resolution 20/8 – adopted by consensus in July 2012 – affirming “that
the same rights that people have offline must also be protected online,
in particular freedom of expression,” and pledging to explore further
“how the Internet can be an important tool for development and for
exercising human rights.” This applies to ending illicit online
surveillance by any government. To be legitimate and lawful, any
surveillance must be limited, targeted, used to deter or investigate
criminalized activity, and subject to independent judicial oversight.
2. Consistency across the many spaces for discussion around Internet
governance issues – including those spaces clustered around regional,
sub-regional, national, linguistic, and other groupings – is crucial to
ensure the principles of openness, transparency, and inclusiveness are
upheld in all venues. This is not multistakeholderism for
multistakeholderism’s sake, but rather recognizing the need to represent
all voices, perspectives and interests in setting standards, norms, and
policies that affect the internet, both locally and globally. The term
multistakeholder is overused and applied to a wide range of events,
groups and processes. Various international organizations, as well as
national governments, must make it a top priority to replace lipservice
to multistakeholderism with genuine efforts to bring all stakeholders to
the table on equal footing.
3. Transparency and accountability are crucial next steps in the
internet governance discussion, and need to be fully implemented by all
stakeholder groups. Businesses are beginning to recognize transparency
reports as serving their users and their corporate social
responsibilities, as well as their bottom-line interests. Governments
likewise should ensure that their policies and practices are fully
transparent as a means of preserving their legitimacy, credibility, and
moral authority with their own citizens and the international community.
In instances of content censorship, surveillance, shutting down or
deliberate slowing down of networks, and other methods of internet
control, these two stakeholder groups must work independently and
together to divulge details about these measures and have them open to
public debate. In addition, governments should institute strict controls
on the export of surveillance and filtering technologies to regimes
that have failed to demonstrate a commitment to upholding human rights,
while the private sector should take a close look at some of their own
practices in this domain. In some countries, bloggers, activists, and
other internet users are subject to beatings, imprisonment, and even
murder when they post information critical of the authorities.
We thank the government of Indonesia for its warm hospitality and
dedicated efforts in successfully hosting the 8th annual meeting of the
Global IGF. Despite the confusion during the summer over whether the
event would be held in Bali, we were able to convene our delegation of
civil society advocates, activists and academics from more than 18
countries. However, three of our colleagues had to cancel their
attendance owing to visa issues. The letter granting certain registered
participants permission to obtain visas upon arrival in Indonesia came
too late, was rejected by airline officials, and was not extended to
participants from all countries. For future IGFs, it would be preferable
to announce the visa on arrival special procedure well in advance and
officially notify the appropriate channels.
Thank you.
Signatories:
- Freedom House
- The Unwanted Witness, Uganda
- Jorge Luis Sierra, México
- Damir Gainutdinov, Russian Federation, AGORA Association
- Nighat Dad, Pakistan, Digital Rights Foundation
- Artem Goriainov, Kyrgyzstan, Public Foundation “Civil Initiative on Internet Policy”
- Giang Dang, Vietnam
- Fatima Cambronero, Argentina, AGEIA DENSI Argentina
- Michelle Fong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong In-Media
- Dalia Haj-Omar, Sudan, GIRIFNA
- Bouziane Zaid, Morocco
- Syahredzan Johan, Malaysia
- Juned Sonido, Philippines
- Myanmar ICT for Development Organization (MIDO)
- Cambodian Center for Independent Media (CCIM)
- Mahmood Enayat, United Kingdom, Small Media
- Abeer Alnajjar, Jordan
- Arzu Geybullayeva, Azerbaijan